|
Corridor Issues
Safety
- The crash rate on I-66 is higher than
the Virginia interstate average
- Emergency vehicle access is hindered
- HOV lane shifts are confusing
Transit Characteristics
- Metrorail Orange Line ridership has
increased 25% at Fairfax County stations from 1995 to 2001
- VRE Manassas Line ridership is up 52%
from 1995 to 2001
Highway Characteristics
- Travel demand is up 33% since 1994.
Daily traffic volumes range from 45,000 to 190,000 vehicles per day
approaching the Capital Beltway
- As many as 90,000 additional vehicles
are expected in the corridor by 2025
- During peak periods, speeds in the
prevailing direction of travel are less than 20 mph
Intermodal Relationships
- No direct bus connections exist from
HOV lanes to Metrorail stations
- Fewer transit choices west of Route
123
- Limited bike/pedestrian access along
and across I-66
Next Steps
- Develop preliminary alternatives
- Hold next round of public meetings in
Winter 2002/2003
- Distribute study materials to local public
venues, including colleges and libraries
- Continue conceptual multimodal engineering,
environmental impact analysis, and transportation analysis
How to Get Involved
Call us on the
Study Hotline
1-866-INFO I66
(1-866-463-6466)
Check out the Study
Website
www.infoi66.com
E-mail comments
or
questions to:
comments@infoi66.com
Mail comments or
questions to:
I-66 Study Office
8403 Arlington Blvd
First Floor, Suite 200
Fairfax, VA 22031
For web links to other projects and studies
in Northern Virginia, visit: www.virginiadot.org/projects
Local Advisory Committee
Chair:
Vienna
Mayor Jane Seeman
Members:
Fairfax County
Chairman
Katherine K. Hanley
At Large
Supervisor
Gerald Connolly
Providence District
Supervisor
Michael R. Frey
Sully District
City of Fairfax
Mayor Robert F. Lederer
Prince William
Chairman
Sean Connaughton
At Large
Supervisor
Edgar S. Wilbourn, III
Gainesville District
Ex Officio:
Karen J. Rae
Director, DRPT
James H.
Offutt
Chairman, Citizens Transportation Committee of Northern
Virginia
Thomas F. Farley
District Administrator, VDOT Northern Virginia District
Richard A. White
Chief Executive Officer, Washington Metropolitan
Area Transit Authority

|
Study
Background
The
I-66 Multimodal Transportation and Environmental Study (I-66 Study) was
initiated by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and the
Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT), in October 2001 to
examine ways of improving mobility along the approximately 24-mile I-66
corridor between I-495 in Fairfax County and U.S. Route 15 in Prince William
County. Study methods, including technical analyses, public involvement
procedures, and alternatives analysis, are being conducted in accordance
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), and will eventually
be documented in an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared jointly
by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration
(FTA). Building on the findings of the 1999 Major Investment Study (MIS),
the current study will look in more detail at multimodal transportation
improvements including highway, HOV, bus, and rail.
Current Study Status
- Initial scoping process completed
- Base mapping compilation completed
- Traffic data collection completed
- Workplace surveys completed
- Environmental field data collection
underway
- Conceptual multimodal alternatives
development initiated
- Existing/future year travel demand
modelling underway
- Siting analysis for new transit stations
and facilities underway
- Information kiosks stocked with I-66
newsletters
- Website updated
Scoping Summary
Scoping is a process used to identify
the range of alternatives, impacts, and significant issues to be addressed
in an EIS. The process includes input from the general public, the Technical
and Local Advisory Committees established for the I-66 Study, and appropriate
federal, state, regional, and local agencies.
Public and agency meetings are an important
element of scoping the study. Public Scoping Meetings were held on January
22, 23, 24, 2002, in Centreville, City of Fairfax, and Manassas, respectively.
The meetings were attended by approximately 110 people total, and involved
one-on-one interaction between citizens and Study Team members. In addition,
29 representatives participated in a meeting for federal, state, regional,
and local agencies.
The Scoping Process yielded suggestions
from 81 different commentors, dated on or before the scoping comment deadline
of February 8, 2002.
The Study Team reviewed all comment forms,
letters, and verbal comments, and broke them down into 323 individual
comments. Those comments were grouped into topical categories, based on
common themes.
The five most common comment themes were:
- Alternatives
Examples: Ideas for multimodal alternatives to include in the study,
such as, extension of Metrorail and VRE service, expanded bus service,
and adding general purpose/HOV lanes
- Transportation
Examples: Traffic bottlenecks at specific locations, the potential effects
of other transportation studies and projects, logistics of HOV lane
connections, and transit connections
- Design
Examples: Interchange and multimodal design, boundaries of design
- Environmental
Examples: Air quality, noise, parks, stormwater, land use
- Implementation
Examples: Funding, cost to community, timing
- By a wide margin, bicyclist and
pedestrian access was the most frequently raised issue. There was
a desire for the design of bicyclist and pedestrian access adjacent
to and across from the I-66 corridor in the study area and to avoid
conflicts with proposed bikepaths.
- The second most frequently raised
issue dealt with the relationship between transportation and land
use growth patterns. Requests for the study to examine region-wide
alternative land use scenarios and to examine integrated land use
and transit alternatives were provided.
While the initial scoping process is complete,
the Study Team will continue to solicit and evaluate public and agency input
to ensure that a reasonable range of alternatives are considered in the
Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS).
The Scoping Process Summary Report, dated May 2002, which lists specific
comments in more detail, and includes study team responses, is available
through the I-66 website (www.infoi66.com), or by calling the I-66 Study
Office at 1-866-INFO I66 (1-866-463-6466).
The Scoping Process Summary
Report, dated May 2002, which lists specific comments in more detail, and
includes study team responses, is available through the I-66 website (www.infoi66.com),
or by calling the I-66 Study Office at 1-866-INFO I66 (1-866-463-6466).
Existing Traffic and
Travel Data
[click
here for study area]
One of the early efforts of the I-66 Study was to compile and collect
traffic and transit travel related data. Traffic counts were recorded
along the I-66 mainline lanes and for each interchange ramp and associated
intersection. Current daily traffic volumes range from 45,000 vehicles
per day at the western limits of the study to up to 190,000 vehicles per
day approaching the Capital Beltway at the eastern limits of the study.
Depending on locations along the corridor, traffic within the study area
has grown by an average of 33 percent since preliminary I-66 volumes were
taken in 1994. Growth in the western portion of the corridor is even more
dramatic, with up to a 59 percent increase since 1994.
Along with increased traffic volumes, demand for transit has increased.
Virginia Railway Express (VRE) ridership for stations near the I-66 corridor
increased 52 percent from 1995 to 2001 to a total of about 4,700 riders
each day. In recent years, VRE ridership has continued to grow at a rate
of 12 to 16 percent each year. The Metrorail Orange Line, which serves
the I-66 corridor from Vienna eastward, reported a 25 percent increase
in people boarding at stations in Fairfax County (west of the East Falls
Church station) since 1995. The Orange Line in Fairfax County currently
serves about 23,000 weekday boardings, contributing considerably to person
throughput in the I-66 corridor.
Environmental Review
Process
The I-66 Multimodal Transportation and Environmental Study (MTES) is
a detailed design and environmental study being undertaken in accord with
processes identified through NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act of
1969). This process, which requires continual public outreach and agency
involvement, is outlined in the chart below.
[click
here for review process chart]
Back to Top
|